How will you run your business? See the tactical decisions brands make in order to deliver on their mission and promise.
Four years after Airbnb began, co-founder Brian Chesky contacted Douglas John Atkin and asked him to help define Airbnb's brand. Douglas responded, "I think that instead of the brand, we should figure out the purpose of Airbnb and its community. There clearly is a huge and vital community of Hosts, Guests, and Employees. Let's figure out what role Airbnb plays in their lives and why they are committed to it. If we can do that, then it will be much easier to figure out what Airbnb's brand is."
Douglas developed Airbnb's purpose 'Belong Anywhere' based on these three ingredients:
Airbnb co-founder Brian Chesky believes a five-star rating is the standard for most marketplace businesses. Unless the experience is horrible, people generally give five-star reviews. However, as Brian describes, "If you want to build something that's truly viral, you have to create a total mindf*ck experience that you tell everyone about."
To create those ultimate experiences, Airbnb worked with Pixar animators to storyboard every frame of a user's experience—from first logging on to the site to the moment a Guest returns home. Each storyboard included a one-star experience all the way to a seven-, ten-, or even eleven-star experience.
The point of the exercise is that while an eleven-star experience may not be feasible, the seven-star experience you thought was unattainable before now seems doable. "That's the sweet spot," Brian concludes, "You have to almost design the extreme to come backward."
In the first years of Airbnb, when their number of users was low and primarily located in New York, an investor gave co-founder Brian Chesky this advice: “Go to your users. Get to know them.” Brian’s response was, “But that won’t scale. If we’re huge and we have millions of customers, we can’t meet every customer.” The investor replied, “That’s exactly why you should do it now because this is the only time you’ll ever be small enough that you can meet all your customers, get to know them, and make something directly for them.”
With that advice, founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia flew to New York. They went to every host’s house, asking to meet and interview them and sometimes even staying with them. They also went door-to-door signing people up, hosted meet-ups, and approached people wherever they could to tell them how to monetize their apartments. During these conversations, the founders also observed how hosts used the Airbnb website. Each week, they would incorporate any feedback they received which led to breakthrough insights, like:
In just eight weeks, Airbnb lost 80% of their business due to the pandemic. Co-founder Brian Chesky learned quickly that "there's not a lot of data in a crisis." Instead of relying on data-driven decisions, he needed to act swiftly and make principled ones. As he explains, "A principled decision is if I can't predict the outcome, how do I want to be remembered?"
Chesky developed four fundamental principles to help guide the company during this time:
At the beginning of Airbnb, co-founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia would sit down personally with customers to understand how they could improve their business. However, they didn't ask about the product that they had already built. They found that by asking questions like, 'What can I do to make this product better?' they received small, uninspiring answers.
To gain the most insightful feedback, they asked about the product of their customers' dreams, with questions like:
Instead of multiple roadmaps spread over multiple divisions, CEO Brian Chesky consolidated Airbnb down to one division made of functional teams that share a singular roadmap. This rolling two-year roadmap contains every Airbnb project being worked on and is aligned to a May or November release date.
For each project, Brian reviews all of its pieces, including the marketing. He explains, "Every week, I would try to see the equivalent of at least a semi-assembly of the entire new product we were working on, which allowed me to identify the different bottlenecks happening in the company."
While the road map was designed not to change for the upcoming month, it is reviewed and updated monthly, allowing the next two years to stay fluid. As for unexpected events, Airbnb ensures that enough resources are in reserve to pivot as needed.
Instead of having product managers, those who lead the development of the product, and outbound marketers, those who promote the product, Airbnb consolidated those responsibilities into one Product Marketing role. As co-founder Brian Chesky explains, "We...connect product and marketing together. Product managers at a company are usually like chefs, marketing are like waiters, and chefs never allow the waiters in the kitchen, or they get yelled at. And I thought, well, what if you actually have them collaborate on a product?"
This shift allows outbound marketers, who have in-depth knowledge of customers and how to tell a story, to collaborate in the innovation process from the beginning. It then becomes the responsibility of product marketing to promote the product but also to "make sure we understand the story we're telling, who the product's for, and make sure everything we deliver ships to that product."
At the beginning of every new initiative, Amazon product managers write an internal press release announcing the product as if it were finished. This page-and-a-half announcement centers around how the product solves a specific customer problem and how it will "blow away existing solutions."
The goal is to keep the writing simple. Paragraphs should have no more than three to four sentences and not include any "geek-speak." As a guideline, Ian McAllister, Director of Amazon Day, recommends writing it as if you were Oprah explaining it to her audience. If the press release doesn't "sound interesting or exciting," the product manager continues to revise it or cancels the project's development.
While creating the press release takes a lot of time, Amazon finds it quicker and less expensive than iterating on the product itself. The press release also serves as a guide in the product's development to help avoid scope creep.
Unlike most companies who engineer their products first then hand it down to designers, Apple reverses this order and begins with design. In fact, everyone else in the organization has to conform to the designer's vision, no questions asked. When creating the Apple II, Jobs had the engineers remove the cooling fan because he believed that a quieter computer is a more beautiful computer. It didn't matter to him that the technology wasn't invented yet—it was up to the engineers to figure that out, which they did.
When Jobs returned to Apple, he consolidated the advertising budget into one single budget where only the most popular products would receive ad dollars. By limiting the number of products promoted, heavily promoted products indirectly drove sales for Apple's other products. So when customers came into stores looking for the iPod, they were also exposed to iMacs as well.
Imagine if the first iPhone had a stylus and a retractable keyboard? That's what Apple believes would have happened if they relied on focus groups to inform the design. To Apple, customers don't innovate, they only iterate what they have seen before. So people actually don't know what they want until you show it to them.
But this doesn't mean to stop listening to customers. Instead know your customers so well that you know what they want before they realize it themselves.
The cost of information being released early about an upcoming innovative product is too risky for Apple. It dampens the anticipation, gives competition time to respond, allows openings for critics to criticize the idea rather than the actual product, and finally steals the thunder from the existing product line.
So it's not surprising that the penalty for revealing any Apple secret, intentionally or unintentionally, is immediate termination and lawsuits. But Apple doesn't stop there.
Chick-fil-A reinvented the fast food franchise model by focusing on finding fully committed owners, which they call Operators, who will be present every day to maintain high quality standards. But to do find the best people, Chick-fil-A first removed the need for any large upfront costs on the Operator's part. This allowed Chick-fil-A to select new owners based on character and values, rather than the size of their wallets.
The Operator's Agreement for Chick-fil-A works like this:
Out of 20,000 applications submitted each year, Chick-fil-A selects only .4%. Their high standards come from a desire to make each relationship last for life, and with less than a 5% turnover rate, in an industry where 30-40% is common, they are succeeding.
Chick-fil-A's marketing goal was to find an uncontested market space, and then dominate it. With a limited budget, they couldn't compete with TV ads—but what they could do, was focus on billboards, 3D billboards to be precise. At the time, billboards were used only to showcase price points and tell people which exit to take. Chick-fil-A, however, found their Blue Ocean by using billboards to build an emotional connection with their brand. Their rules for billboards were simple:
Instead of relegating innovation to a few experts, Chick-fil-A opens up their innovation process to the entire organization.
Staff from each department volunteer and then are trained to become innovation coaches. They then go back to their teams as consultants to help facilitate innovation using Chick-fil-A's innovation methodology:
From the start of the process, each team member is encouraged to play the part of a particular thinking type:
Over ten years ago, Chick-fil-A wanted to relay to its staff, in the simplest visual format, how each brand touchpoint, although separate, connects everyone together across the organization. They started by placing all touchpoints around a wheel design to breakdown the stigma of organizational silos. Everyone is responsible to work around the wheel and have influence in all projects, even if they are not directly accountable. At the center of the wheel, aligning everyone together, is their brand essence.
A brand essence is a short rallying cry created to embody a brand cause, mission, promise, and personality. Chick-fil-A defines theirs as: Where good meets gracious.
All new products and services are first tested by Chick-fil-A in roughly 60 to 100 stores for a one-year period. During this time, Chick-fil-A surveys customers to see if the new product or service are consistent "with what they perceived to be the Chick-fil-A brand."
When choosing between shoestring and waffle fries, Chick-fil-A used this methodology and found that, even though waffle fries were more expensive, customers saw them as a better brand fit. Shoestring fries were trying too hard to be like everyone else, and waffle fries were visually different, and perceived to be more nutritious.
To Chick-fil-A coupons and discounts scream, “Our products are not worth full price." Instead of being a "transaction-chasing" brand like other fast-food restaurants, Chick-fil-A chooses to build their brand through personal relationships.
Google uses the 70-20-10 rule to ensure that their time and resources are spent on improving their core products but also on growth and brand new innovations.
How Google allocates their resources:
Google's top 100 projects are managed on a spreadsheet and then organized into these three buckets. The prioritization of the list is reviewed and adjusted semi-quarterly and is always available for staff to see on the company's intranet.
Anything Google does more than once is measured and then improved upon. For Google Search alone, they will conduct over 8,000 A/B tests and more than 2,500 one-percent tests in a given year. That averages out to roughly 30 experiments a day so that they can better understand what works best for their users.
All testing is done in-house as Google finds using consultants to be too costly. They also don't want to run the risk of missing out on any insights that might have been overlooked by non-Googlers.
Without being able to effectively measure the success of your products or services, it will be impossible to know if your choices were right, wrong, or somewhere in the middle. To solve for this, Google measures the quality of the user experience using the HEART method:
How to use the HEART method:
See an example of the HEART method in action.
At the beginning of each quarter, Google leadership sets clear company-wide goals called OKRs, Objectives and Key Results. Based on these corporate OKRs, staff create personal OKRs that align with the organization's. Everyone's OKRs are then posted publicly on the intranet, right next to the person's phone number and office location.
Each Key Result is graded on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0 and then averaged together to determine the final score for the Objective. The "sweet spot" score is around 60-70%. Google has found that allowing this much room for failure, empowers employees to set stretch goals that help keep the company innovative and advancing forward.
At Netflix, if an employee has an idea that they're passionate about, there is an innovation cycle process to bring it to life.
Step One: Farm for dissent or socialize the idea
Create a shared memo explaining your idea and invite colleagues to rate it on a scale from -10 to +10 with their explanation and comments; or set up multiple meetings to stress-test the idea.
Step Two: For a big idea, test it out
Nothing works better than a small, isolated test for proposals that involve a lot of time, work hours, and resources. Tests take place even when those in charge are dead set against the idea.
Step Three: As the informed captain, place your bet
This is not a democracy, consensus, or a vote. As the person in charge of the project, you take full responsibility. You do not need anyone's permission, agreement, or sign-off to move forward with an idea, no matter its cost or size.
Step Four: If it wins, celebrate it; if it fails, sunshine it
Successes are celebrated by all and especially by managers who expressed dissent early on publicly saying 'You were right, I was wrong.' Failures are not grounds for termination but learning opportunities on how to succeed better next time. Informed captains are required to write an open memo to the entire company explaining what happened and the lessons that were learned.
Unlike its competitors, Netflix doesn't believe in testing TV shows with just one episode before committing to a full season. Instead, they buy or commission a series from start to finish. Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos describes the strategy like this: "In our research of more than 20 shows across 16 markets, we found that no one was ever hooked on the pilot. This gives us confidence that giving our members all episodes at once is more aligned with how fans are made." This approach also places more accountability on the show's project owner, who can't hide behind the excuse of 'it tested really well.'
The future can't be predicted and any time Netflix tried, they were always wrong—especially when it came to budgeting. Instead, the time wasted on yearly planning is now spent doing quarterly planning and a rolling three-quarter budget. To Netflix, it's a horrible idea to hold off on growth opportunities because of budget constraints set months ago.
Although they are best known for their clothing line, Patagonia has never limited themselves to only one industry. Instead, they expand their business based on the positive impact it could make on the environment.
With each expansion, Patagonia is always asked "What do a bunch of climbers know about this?" or "What does a clothing company know about that?" And their answer is always "nothing," but if it helps save the planet, they will commit to it 100%.
There is no question to Patagonia's commitment to their mission. In their history, they:
However, what makes them so purpose-focused is that they see everything in the world through the lens of environmental conservation. Their support of Planned Parenthood comes from the viewpoint that the non-profit is working towards "the single greatest cause of environmental problems: overpopulation."
When Patagonia realized that the conventional cotton production process was creating severe environmental and health issues, they abandoned the process completely for an organic cotton supply chain. At the time though, Patagonia had no idea how to do this, but because it was the right thing to do, they created an organic supply chain on their own. Within eighteen months, they completely reengineered their operations and were able to:
In the late 80s, Patagonia was growing fast—50% a year fast. They started opening more locations and increasing their inventory production. But after the 1991 recession, dealers started cancelling orders and inventory began to build. Patagonia now had too many people with too little work being overseen by too many layers of management. With an inflated product line, they also had neglected to take into account the cost of having to design, produce, warehouse, and catalog all these products.
After almost losing the business because of this, Founder Yvon Chouinard decided to change their growth mindset from growing fat to growing strong. Patagonia began looking at their business as if they were going to be around for the next 100 years having to take responsibility for the decisions they made today.
As a result, Patagonia stopped looking at quarterly earnings and setting yearly growth projections. "One year we will grow 3% another year we will grow 20%," Yvon explains—and he is okay with that. Patagonia now chooses to wait for the customer to tell them how much product to make. Slow or no growth just means that profits have to come from "being more efficient with operations and living within [brand's] means."
Patagonia also now knows exactly how many people they need to hire if they want to add just one product to their line.
When changing their operational structure from conventional to organic cotton farming, Patagonia wanted to understand what impact this higher operational cost would have on sales. Through customer surveys, Patagonia found that quality was the most significant reason that customers bought from them. Brand name and price were secondary, while environmental concerns were last.
Understanding this customer perspective gave Patagonia some room to raise prices slightly, but to keep prices from exceeding two to ten dollars over conventional cotton cost, they reduced their margins in partner retail spaces. Products that could not meet the margin goal were limited to Patagonia's own retail stores and mail-order channels to keep prices down.
When focusing on quality, there will come a day when you look at a current product and say 'I can do better.' For Patagonia, that day came only a few months after their new environmentally-friendly chocks came to market.
Having received feedback from fellow climbers that there may be a better way to make them, Patagonia had a choice: 1) Give their working new chocks their day in the sun knowing that quality could be improved or; 2) Start again...immediately.
True to their values, they scrapped all of their tooling, invested in all new designs, and came out with a new modernized chock. Coincidentally, that very same month a competitor came out with an exact copy of Patagonia's old and now very obsolete chock design.
Patagonia tests every product out in the field until something fails. They then strengthen that part, test again until something else fails then strengthen that part. They repeat this process ad nauseam until the product is durable as a whole.
Top climbers, surfers, and endurance athletes are also provided gear and sometimes salaries and benefits "to wear [Patagonia] clothes, in order to give...feedback and help with design issues." Patagonia even does a "quick and dirty" test of competitor products to see if any of their ideas are worth pursuing.
Too often a company will hand their designs over to a production team without understanding the full development process upfront. This assembly-line style can lead to the production team changing design elements to meet production requirements and the sewing team altering construction to meet their own practices. Patagonia has found that by all teams working together upfront to set standards, the product's purpose, process, and intended performance are never jeopardized.
As Yvon Chouinard puts it: "If a button falls off in your customer's hand as she pulls the pants out of the washing machine..[she] will never again fully trust your claim to quality."
Patagonia has suffered through every stage of trying to find the best place to spot check for quality—at the factory level, at the sewing machine level, and also just before the sewing machine level. What they found was that if you take "extraordinary steps to set up the manufacturing correctly the first time, it is much cheaper than taking extraordinary steps down the line."
As a brand that relies on outside vendors to make their apparel, it has never made sense for Patagonia to use the same vendors that sew shorts for Walmart one day and for Patagonia the next—the quality and attention to detail just cannot be trusted. Instead, Patagonia looks for partners that meet their "4-fold" set of standards: Business, quality, environmental, and social standards.
"We audit potential partners to determine how they manage workers, we interview workers to determine their perspective on the factory, and we engage Civil Society to verify that the factory has positive employment record," writes Yvon Chouinard. If they find a partner that meets their standards, but does not have a strong company culture, Patagonia will send people to train the vendor's HR team, so that both cultures align.
It might sound risky, but Patagonia prefers to be dependent on just a few suppliers that are, in return, dependent on them. Patagonia considers this a "true partnership." Founder Yvon Chouinard describes this strategy like this: "Our potential success is linked. We become like friends, family, mutually selfish business partners; what's good for them is good for us."
Patagonia wants to keep their messaging efforts simple: Share who they are, their values, their outdoor pursuits, and their passions. When it comes to measuring the value of that messaging, they don't even consider trying to conduct a square inch sales analysis of their catalog. They consider this analysis to be irrelevant and could create a culture focused on profits over purpose.
Whether its something as small as recalling malfunctioning pens or as impactful as closing hotels that cannot maintain Gold Standards, The Ritz-Carlton refuses to sacrifice on the quality of their product. Even during economically depressed times, they focused on providing maximum quality through efficiency rather than cutting corners. As co-founder Ed Staros remembers during the 1980s: "Just because the economy was bad, it did not mean the guest didn't want mouthwash."
This dedication has led The Ritz-Carlton to win the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award twice and pretty much every major award in the hospitality category.
High satisfaction scores only tell you if customers are happy, not if they are loyal to your brand. So, The Ritz-Carlton began measuring customer engagement with Gallup's CE11 survey and employee engagement with Gallup's Q12 survey. By measuring both employee and customer engagement holistically, which Gallup refers to as HumanSigma, The Ritz-Carlton started to see the direct effect that employee engagement had on the customer experience.
The Ritz-Carton staff are provided Guest Preference Pads, so they can write down notes about guests and later upload them to their customer relationship management (CRM) database. Any problem encountered or preference expressed, gets written down. Staff even do a quick Google search of guests to add their pictures to the database.
All of this information is then shared with staff during the morning lineup to help prepare for the day. The staff also are fed information through ear piece radios to help welcome guests by name and to make their stay more personal.
Problems, mistakes, and defects will always occur but The Ritz-Carlton trains and encourages every employee to spot, report, and help solve these MR BIV sightings right away.
MR BIV (an acronym for Mistakes, Rework, Breakdowns, Inefficiencies, and Variations) is The Ritz-Carlton's way of continually trying to improve their systems.
Once a MR BIV has been identified, it's important to determine if the problem is a symptom of something larger. Staff begin by asking themselves 'Why' as many as five times to find the root cause, and then a permanent solution. For example, one Ritz-Carlton property was having problems with room service being late, so employees took it upon themselves to start asking 'Why.'
But be careful to always receive MR BIV with open arms and a curious mind. Attacking or blaming employees for problems will only lead to them never helping you find a MR BIV again.
The Ritz-Carlton has an innovation database where new proven problem resolutions can be shared with all of their hotels who may be facing similar challenges. The database has thousands of innovative solutions ranging from more effective ways to manage check-ins during busy times to introducing transportation vehicles for speedy beverage delivery on the beach.
At The Ritz-Carlton, for every four housekeepers, there is one person who spot checks their work against a quality control checklist. Scores are determined on a 100 point scale and anything below a 95% is considered below standard and requires a follow-up with the housekeeper to review what went wrong.
Southwest co-founder Herb Kelleher used to say: “Conventional wisdom put a hell of a lot of airlines out of business.” In order to stay true to being the low-cost, reliable, fun airline, Southwest remained disciplined in avoiding popular trends and strategies used by competitors. Unlike other airlines, Southwest:
By sticking with one type of plane, the Boeing 737, Southwest has been able to:
Southwest's philosophy has been to "not endlessly plan, discuss, and study in an effort to avoid the risk involved in actually making a decision." Instead, they gather the available facts as quickly as possible, make the necessary analysis, discuss it with the appropriate people, execute, and clean up any mistakes later.
In 2002, Starbucks' primary goal became to show Wall Street continued growth and increased comparative sales at all costs. As their store count tripled over the next five years, the Starbucks Experience weakened.
The warm environment became a sterile cookie-cutter template that could be easily replicated for new stores; the showmanship of coffee was replaced with button pushing; DVDs, CDs, and stuffed animals were front and center to increase daily store sales; and managers and staff were now trained by just being handed a "thick, three-ring binder of rules, techniques, and coffee information and was simply told to 'read it.'"
Slowly the amount of money each customer was spending in stores began to dip. By 2007, traffic slowed to the lowest levels in history and Starbucks was forced to close 8% of their US stores and let go over 12,000 people globally to stay in business.
Howard Schultz returned as CEO in 2008 and brought with him his own Transformation Agenda that he shared openly with the entire company in a ten part series. He wanted to refocus the company on one customer, one partner, and one cup of coffee at a time. To help free everyone to enthusiastically refocus on what was best for the customer, and not Wall Street, Starbucks would:
It took time but by June 2009, customer satisfaction began to rise again and Starbucks stock was on an upward trend rising 41%.
Starting in the 1970s, Starbucks had begun building a customer-base through mail order. These coffee enthusiasts had discovered Starbucks either from vacationing in Seattle or having recently moved from the Seattle area. In their hometowns they began spreading awareness of Starbucks through their network of friends, who then began ordering from Starbucks as well. As Starbucks began to focus on nationwide expansion, Howard leveraged the data he had on this customer-base to decide where to open stores.
Starbucks started using LEAN management techniques after seeing how one store manager took it upon herself to implement them and saw great results.
LEAN techniques removed any process that wasted time or took away from the customer experience. This allowed baristas to spend more time talking with customers and less time searching for things that were either in the wrong place or completely missing.
But former CEO, Howard Schultz feared that these practices would make Starbucks feel more like a factory run by a corporation rather than a local coffee shop. To avoid this, he ensured that headquarters would only provide the tools and training for LEAN techniques, and left it to the store managers to implement these techniques in their own unique way.
Some of the ways that Starbucks reduced redundancies and waste was to:
These changes might seem obvious but it wasn't until they started looking at every movement through LEAN that inefficiencies became clear. Within 6 months of implementation Starbucks customer satisfaction and quality scores had improved, productivity and revenue increased, and turnover dropped significantly.
Starbucks fully owns the coffee procurement process and all of their roasting facilities, but what about everything else? All other aspects of the supply chain are strictly monitored through what is called the Starbucks Coffee and Farmer Equity (CAFE) Practices. This helps to ensure that all vendors align with Starbucks values and quality standards.
CAFE Practices, developed by Starbucks staff, judge vendors on a set of over 200 indicators. Anyone scoring a 60 or above receives enhanced pricing and contract terms, while anything less requires you to go through the time and expense of re-verification in a year.
But even before CAFE Practices launched in 2004, vendors have always been judged on four criteria:
In 1999, Starbucks opened their first store in China and a year later they expanded into Australia as well. By 2022, there were 4,200 stores in China and in Australia, 70% of its original 90 stores were closed. The difference? In Australia, Starbucks expanded rapidly and did not take the time to adapt to local preferences. In China, however, Starbucks took a more localized approach by:
People wonder how Trader Joe's can keep prices low while also treating their employees well and turn a profit. To do this, Trader Joe's takes every opportunity to find ways to cut operational costs, like:
Instead of corporate budgeting, Trader Joe's leaves setting targets, planning, and forecasting up to each individual store. This decentralized approach reinforces two of the brand's values:
When looking to open a new Trader Joe's, founder Joe Coulombe's strategy was to "have a few stores, as far apart as possible, and to make them as high volume as possible." To do this, Joe would:
As a result, Trader Joe's achieves sales of $1,000/sq foot of total area, while supermarkets $570/sq foot of sales area.
As Joe Coulombe wrote: "Each year, 22,000 new products are introduced to the grocery trade, most of them from big guns like Procter & Gable or Colgate, who have conducted elaborate test marketing before going nationwide. Ninety percent of these new products fail."
Instead, Trader Joe's takes a different approach placing small orders of new products and if they sell they order more—if not, leftovers go to charity.
As Trader Joe's sees it, collecting customers' data is like spying on them. That is why, even in the age of analytics and AI, they don't have membership accounts, customer relationship management systems, or any other systems to segment, track, or categorize their customers' habits. Instead, they rely on gaining direct feedback from their customers during their daily interactions.
When it comes to non-profit giving, the Trader Joe's philosophy is to give generously but to always:
There is no 'pay to play' to get your product on a Trader Joe's shelf, like in most supermarkets. Instead, every product goes through a rigorous Tasting Panel where only 10% of the products actually pass the test.
These Testing Panels are designed to remove any romance and story from the product. "There's nothing in there that makes it comfortable...It's like a cold war interrogation booth, because we want the products that succeed to go through this like ultra-Darwinian exercise to say that they could stand up even to that harshest light of critical evaluation."
If a product passes with a 70% or more approval rating, it is only then that Trader Joe's asks about the price. Then the bargaining begins and "if the cost is too high and we can't get it for less, we won't buy it."
Since 1977, Trader Joe's has run its operations on the philosophy that you should outsource anything that isn't central to your primary job. And for Trader Joe's that's everything except buying and selling. As founder Joe Coulombe wrote: "We got rid of our own maintenance people, we sold off almost all the real estate we had acquired during the 1970s, we never took mainframe computing in-house."
To prove to themselves that they are continually improving in service, Umpqua Bank began measuring customer and staff service quality. The scores are calculated each month, teams are ranked, and the results are posted for everyone.
The goal is to reward team performance, not individual accomplishment. The winning store and department both receive a crystal trophy that they proudly display until it moves on to the next winner the following month. Any store or department that ranks poorly for some time is asked to develop an improvement plan and then is held accountable for implementing it.
Store Return on Quality (ROQ) Measurements
Department Return on Quality Measurements
Departments at Umpqua each have developed service-level agreements (SLA) with one another. These agreements include standards such as turnaround time. Every associate who interacts with a specific department provides both positive and negative feedback to that department with an SLA survey.
During the Great Recession, Umpqua Bank had no layoffs and didn't reduce costs. While this was the strategy of many companies, former CEO Ray Davis instead invested in Umpqua's capacity. He explains, "How can we weather the storm by reducing our resources? When you are in stormy seas, you call out, 'All hands on deck,' you don't tell half of them to jump overboard...The last thing we wanted to do was weaken our ability to create our own future."
Even though their earnings took a hit, Umpqua emerged from the Great Recession quickly and with a stronger balance sheet than ever before. Ray attributes this to Umpqua's ability not to hunker down but instead invest in opportunities like:
But this doesn't mean Umpqua condones retaining excess overhead. Ray clarifies, "I am as much for efficiency as anyone, but why wait for problems to run your company as efficiently as possible?"
After any order or after certain customer interactions, Zappos sends out email surveys to these customers in order to help calculate their Net Promoter Score and learn more about the experiences the customers received. Questions have included:
Results are then calculated each day and shared with the entire company. Each team member also receives their own individual scores for the calls they specifically handled.